[This
is when it went to the Volunteer list]
From: xxxxxxxx(Pat)
To: xxxxxxxx(Michelle), xxxxxxxx(Leah),
dare@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 2/7/2007 12:36:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: RE: [DAR&E] OT: Contented Rest
Greetings all,
A few volunteers E-mailed me indicating that the decision
was done and she was headed back into a situation (to Kim Dandoff) where she did not thrive. I would like the BOD to
issue a statement of facts, not emotions, and tell the membership how they believe that Stella will get the care that she
needs. We need the facts folks.. to have a productive discussion.
Anyone involved with Stella (transporters, fosters, home
visitors), please send the facts or personal observations to the list so we can see what decisions have/have not
been made regarding Stella. Lets please keep this discussion professional. We all want what is best for Stella.
Thanks,
Pat xxxxx.
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxxxxx(Michelle)
Sent: Feb 7, 2007 12:24 PM
To: xxxxxxxx(Leah), "Dare@Yahoogroups. Com"
Subject: RE: [DAR&E] OT: Contented
Rest
I didn't know we were considering moving her back.
From: DARE@yahoogroups. com [mailto:DARE@ yahoogroups.
com] On Behalf Of Leah xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:26 AM
To: Dare@Yahoogroups.
Com
Subject: [DAR&E] OT: Contented Rest
Sounds like it might be time for another public discussion
about one of our dogs...
I'm just writing to let my opinion be know about the decisions
being made with regard to Stella. The membership is aware that there is a discussion about the best thing for her
and whether or not she should be placed back with Dr. Danoff. If she was removed from Dr. Danoff, why would she go back?
When I saw the most recent pic Alla sent, I asked about
the weight gain and Alla sent me these pictures of Stella when she arrived at her house. She was in much better
shape when she originally came into our rescue. This does not look like a dog that was well cared for, least to say
cared for by a vet. We took Dr. Danoff at her word in the beginning and she has not, from what I understand, followed
through on her promises. Where is Stella's brace/prosthesis? How is that working? If these promises haven't
been made good by now, what on earth would make us think that a second time would be any different?
Stella is in a loving foster home and is thriving.
Why would we change that? Least to say - why would we send her back to a neglectful situation? Not saying that
it was intentional neglect but it doesn't sound like Dr. Danoff has the time, nor inclination to give Stella the care that
she requires to live a happy and healthy life. This dog deserves better than spending her days in a crate or locked
in a room by herself.
I'm asking that the BOD please think this decision out thoroughly and
carefully consider ALL the options for Stella. She's a beautiful dog and deserves the best and most
normal life that we can help her have. I do not believe that this life is with Dr. Danofff, nor do many others.